RomanArmyTalk › Research Arena › Roman Military History & Archaeology v
Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour
Tarbicus Offline
Legatus Legionis [may request custom title]
*********
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 0
#12
08-07-2008, 06:16 PM
There's a part to a military oath, swearing to not the break the line except to recover a weapon that can be used again, IIRC?
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 03:39 AM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Tarbicus - 08-07-2008, 06:16 PM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 11:00 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Metal Armour-Polished or Dull? Sanvean 81 18,620 11-14-2007, 05:02 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS
  Were thin baldrics worn in the 3rd century ? Theodosius the Great 0 969 11-18-2004, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Theodosius the Great

Forum Jump: