06-07-2004, 11:46 AM
Why did the Romans not conquer Scotland? For all the effort put into building walls, forts etc and beating them back whenever they got restless... Why not just finish the job and conquer the Caledonii/Picts? I understand that the Picts guerrilla tactics and terrain would have made it hard but surely they faced these problems in other countries? <p></p><i></i>