06-06-2008, 10:36 AM
I might be inclined to agree with Arahne on this. Perhaps the development shouldn't be stopped altogether, but rather delayed. Maybe the developer could be 'persuaded' by the government to contribute some funding to ensuring that anything of historical value be removed from the site before they begin building on top of it?
At the same time, I agree that reckless modernization is too opposite extreme. There has to be a middle ground that can be found.
ETA: Maybe one of our Spanish speaking members could provide a rough interpretation of the petition?
At the same time, I agree that reckless modernization is too opposite extreme. There has to be a middle ground that can be found.
ETA: Maybe one of our Spanish speaking members could provide a rough interpretation of the petition?
Marcus Julius Germanus
m.k.a. Brian Biesemeyer
S.P.Q.A.
m.k.a. Brian Biesemeyer
S.P.Q.A.