Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ruling RAT
#11
I will sing the"Three-fold Amen" to all the above AND vote yes to the new vetting procedure as well because I, too dislike strictly commercial interests getting involved with the Board. Since we are an international group, we cannot be accused of being nationalistic or isolationist, I however, would rather deal and buy from my fellow enthusiasts. I suppose my P.O.V. could be considered rather provincial, but I just have no interest in getting shafted by a mega-corp who is in it for the money.
Comments anyone?

Respectfully,
Vitruvius
a.k.a. Larry Mager
Larry A. Mager
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Ruling RAT - by Jasper Oorthuys - 05-07-2008, 02:10 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Caballo - 05-07-2008, 02:27 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Gaius Julius Caesar - 05-07-2008, 03:07 PM
Tiumphs for the Moderators - by Vitruvius - 05-07-2008, 04:57 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Robert Vermaat - 05-07-2008, 06:31 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Jvrjenivs - 05-07-2008, 07:41 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Jasper Oorthuys - 05-07-2008, 08:51 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Giannis K. Hoplite - 05-08-2008, 12:29 AM
Re: Ruling RAT - by sulla felix - 05-08-2008, 06:07 AM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Martin Moser - 05-08-2008, 07:03 AM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Vitruvius - 05-08-2008, 07:00 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by Hibernicus - 05-08-2008, 07:49 PM
Suggestion - by Catvs Glavcvs Draconis - 05-08-2008, 10:26 PM
Re: Ruling RAT - by sulla felix - 05-09-2008, 03:46 AM
Re: Ruling RAT - by jkaler48 - 05-09-2008, 10:07 AM

Forum Jump: