05-17-2007, 06:12 AM
As Magnus has pointed out, this is a scholarly / scientific forum. This implies that arguments made here about armour are supposed to be backed up by primary and secondary sources, published archaeological experiments AND material evidence. To transform this thread into something that is also enjoyable to read for future RAT members, I suggest that all further statements made here concerning the quality of muscle cuirasses follow this simple rule. I know that some people have the opinion that RAT is over moderated, but you see this moderating here rather as you would see a discussion leader in a seminar. It seems to be necessary.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.