02-11-2003, 04:40 PM
Salve,<br>
<br>
No unit can win a battle on its own. What is more important is that an army works as one body. Archers can be really devastating (Crecy, Agincourt, Nagashino), but in all of these battle's, the arrows or bulets were followed up by a charge of cavalry or infantry. Try it in one of the Total War games, it works! (thats how i win most of the times). Furthermore, in my experience the type of unit is not important to win - the commander and morale is decisive.<br>
<br>
oh, i can't wait for RTW for to arrive<br>
<br>
gr, jeroen <p></p><i></i>
<br>
No unit can win a battle on its own. What is more important is that an army works as one body. Archers can be really devastating (Crecy, Agincourt, Nagashino), but in all of these battle's, the arrows or bulets were followed up by a charge of cavalry or infantry. Try it in one of the Total War games, it works! (thats how i win most of the times). Furthermore, in my experience the type of unit is not important to win - the commander and morale is decisive.<br>
<br>
oh, i can't wait for RTW for to arrive<br>
<br>
gr, jeroen <p></p><i></i>
gr,
Jeroen Pelgrom
Rules for Posting
I would rather have fire storms of atmospheres than this cruel descent from a thousand years of dreams.
Jeroen Pelgrom
Rules for Posting
I would rather have fire storms of atmospheres than this cruel descent from a thousand years of dreams.
