06-29-2006, 10:35 PM
Daniel S Peterson\\n
I agree. Do you know if the site is closed to independent archaeologists and/or anthropologists? or if anyone has any "secondhand knowlege" since after the find in 2003. I know second hand info isn't exactly reliable, but it would possibly provide a lead that could turn up something solid. If that is the case, we could at least start to get somewhere. I don't think we could go much backwards from what we already know about it per the Scotsman. BTW, how reliable of a source is the Scotsman? Every other source that I have found either quotes it directly, is a direct link to the Scotsman site or paraphrases the Scotsman. I am beginning to wonder if this was not some kind of hoax that is being covered up, but that is just speculation on my part.
Quote:
I agree. Do you know if the site is closed to independent archaeologists and/or anthropologists? or if anyone has any "secondhand knowlege" since after the find in 2003. I know second hand info isn't exactly reliable, but it would possibly provide a lead that could turn up something solid. If that is the case, we could at least start to get somewhere. I don't think we could go much backwards from what we already know about it per the Scotsman. BTW, how reliable of a source is the Scotsman? Every other source that I have found either quotes it directly, is a direct link to the Scotsman site or paraphrases the Scotsman. I am beginning to wonder if this was not some kind of hoax that is being covered up, but that is just speculation on my part.
To change your mind and to follow him who sets you right is to be nonetheless the free agent that you were before. (Marcus Aurelius)
LVCIVS VALERIVS HOMVLVS
(Clayton Braswell)
LVCIVS VALERIVS HOMVLVS
(Clayton Braswell)
