04-10-2006, 11:59 PM
I got the idea while watching History Channel's "Bodicca"- some reenactor Roman legionnaires were wearing a odd-looking breastplate with hinged shoulder guards. I thought- thats a good idea! Simpler design, equally good protection, why didn't the Romans do that? Why, indeed, go with the complexities of a lorica segmentata? All- those hinged parts, difficult to stow and maintain. Why?? Any idea what the urgent need behind that peculiar armor was?
Only thing I could think of is that the armor was designed for packed formations where the danger was from slashing blows above. Lorica Segmentata protected the shoulders well- allowing the legionnaire to use quick jabs with unprotected arms and shoving shield boss to fight. But I still don't see why the need for segmented body armour- for hurling pilum? Or is it a question of simple manufacture?
Only thing I could think of is that the armor was designed for packed formations where the danger was from slashing blows above. Lorica Segmentata protected the shoulders well- allowing the legionnaire to use quick jabs with unprotected arms and shoving shield boss to fight. But I still don't see why the need for segmented body armour- for hurling pilum? Or is it a question of simple manufacture?
"In a state where corruption abounds, laws must be very numerous." - Tacitus
