06-20-2007, 11:21 PM
Quote:Consider the reverse - "leather is protective, no matter how poorly. Ergo, any article of clothing made of leather is armour". That is, I would submit, absurd.
It would be if I said that. I never did. Rather the item is clearly armor as indicated by 500+ years of visual tradition. The nature of those depictions suggest leather. That is all. Neither do I think a boot is a piece of armor, because it is made of leather. Rather I see armor that is made of a material that can not be explained, except as leather.
When it comes to the value of leather armor I couldn't care less. I have no dog in this fight. I am only following the evidence. Romans made armor out of leather, or else the artwork is totally untrustworthy.
Theodoros of Smyrna (Byzantine name)
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)
Moderator, RAT
Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting
Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)
Moderator, RAT
Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting
Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?