02-23-2006, 12:02 AM
Quote:Conjectural I know, but I feel image over personal practicality is an officer trait seen throughout history, and the idea of impractical leather armour has a basis for plausibility: Vanity. Besides, they weren't actually in battle that often, so the risks were quite low.How is that different to stipulating that this armour is ceremonial and has no function other than to look pretty - to serve one's vanity.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books