Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why the switch from Montefortino to Coolus/Iperial helmets happened?
#7
(07-23-2018, 09:31 AM)Corvus Wrote: Also why the switch from the Imperial- Gallic helmets to the Intercisa  helmets of late antiquity? Was it cheaper to produce? Or were there other considerations behind it?


Also unknown, but there are a few theories.
One is the construction of the last IG-type helmet, which by the early 3rd c. had a very large neck guard. It is thought that due to new (mainly moubted) enemies, a new fighting stance called for a flexible neck guard.
Also, construction in many parts that were riveted together instead of only piece with only the cheekplates attached may have been the answer of the Roman state to the shortage of material due to the massive losses during the Crisis of the third century. New-style fabricae, no longer attached to legions but giant regional complexes would thus have been able to churn out many more helmets than before. These helmets were 9as Always), influenced by a successful enemy - in this case the Persians.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Why the switch from Montefortino to Coolus/Iperial helmets happened? - by Robert Vermaat - 07-24-2018, 01:40 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  More Evidence of Cast Montefortino Helmets Creon01 5 1,446 04-05-2014, 06:22 AM
Last Post: caiusbeerquitius
  Metal lathes for spinning Coolus helmets and such L_CORNELIUS_CETHEGUS 13 3,605 05-01-2009, 02:58 PM
Last Post: Gaius Julius Caesar
  did the army switch from caligae in 1st cent? richsc 13 3,344 01-20-2002, 01:43 PM
Last Post: richsc

Forum Jump: