Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roman Army "General Staff"?
#3
Many thanks to Nathan Ross for his detailed - and excellent - reply.  A pity that our more modern practice of keeping diaries and producing memoirs was not common in these times; nor their results preserved!  Certainly the reflections of a camp prefect upon his time in the service would be invaluable.   I suppose that I should not be surprised that the person-centric approach applied to the Roman military rather than the process-centric approach common to modern organizations.  This also suggests that - at a point in time - some legions were well-equipped, and forward-looking to their needs; while others with poorer leadership were not.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Roman Army "General Staff"? - by Mikeh55 - 07-06-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: Roman Army "General Staff"? - by Nathan Ross - 07-11-2017, 12:24 PM
RE: Roman Army "General Staff"? - by Mikeh55 - 07-14-2017, 01:49 PM
RE: Roman Army "General Staff"? - by Nathan Ross - 07-14-2017, 02:45 PM
RE: Roman Army "General Staff"? - by richsc - 07-16-2017, 04:43 AM
RE: Roman Army "General Staff"? - by Christopher Herndon - 11-30-2017, 06:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Staff Slings and the Roman Army MarcusNorwood 3 2,010 04-30-2014, 09:22 PM
Last Post: Eleatic Guest
  Roman term for \'General\' Carus Andiae 9 3,124 10-04-2005, 11:40 AM
Last Post: Carus Andiae
  Roman generals in general lacking rv 8 3,079 08-29-2005, 06:25 AM
Last Post: Theodosius the Great

Forum Jump: