Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sex in the Roman Army
#6
(12-01-2016, 03:38 PM)MonsGraupius Wrote: I presume the same applies to Eunuchs?

Eunuchs were extremely rare, and a valuable commodity - it was also illegal to 'make' them within the empire. So it's unlikely that a eunuch would find himself in that position... Besides, slaves or freedmen were banned from the army, and eunuchs would have been one or the other! Army recruits also had a medical examination upon enlistment, which could well have exposed any abnormalities on the sex or gender front...
Nathan Ross
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-01-2016, 10:36 AM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-01-2016, 02:39 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-01-2016, 03:08 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-01-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-01-2016, 03:38 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-01-2016, 03:48 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-04-2016, 10:45 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-05-2016, 06:01 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-05-2016, 07:55 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-05-2016, 09:32 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Nathan Ross - 12-05-2016, 09:40 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Bryan - 12-05-2016, 09:49 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Flavius Inismeus - 12-04-2016, 07:24 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Bryan - 12-04-2016, 09:09 PM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by Crispianus - 12-06-2016, 08:47 AM
RE: Sex in the Roman Army - by MonsGraupius - 12-08-2016, 02:27 PM

Forum Jump: