RomanArmyTalk › Research Arena › Roman Military History & Archaeology v
Why no battered helmets?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Why no battered helmets?
Anonymous
Unregistered
 
#7
03-01-2002, 01:21 AM
Yup.<br>
Same reasons you dont see many medieval suits with damage, they were "recycled". Heck, look at all the ancient armour that was melted down as late as WWII to use the metal. I understnd the necessity, but it still makes me nuts <p></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why no battered helmets? - by richard - 02-28-2002, 03:09 AM
Re: Why no battered helmets? - by mcbishop - 02-28-2002, 10:35 AM
Re: Why no battered helmets? - by Anonymous - 02-28-2002, 01:50 PM
Re: Why no battered helmets? - by richard - 02-28-2002, 01:54 PM
helmets - by Anonymous - 03-01-2002, 01:21 AM
Re: helmets - by Anonymous - 03-01-2002, 01:57 AM
Re: helmets - by Daniel S Peterson - 03-01-2002, 06:48 AM
Re: helmets - by Anonymous - 03-01-2002, 05:43 PM
Kalkriese - by Jasper Oorthuys - 03-02-2002, 10:43 AM
Re: Kalkriese - by Daniel S Peterson - 03-02-2002, 05:35 PM
Re: Kalkriese - by Jasper Oorthuys - 03-02-2002, 06:34 PM
Re: Kalkriese - by Daniel S Peterson - 03-02-2002, 11:39 PM
Re: Kalkriese - by Richomeres - 03-03-2002, 04:34 PM
Varus and scouts - by Anonymous - 03-04-2002, 02:29 AM

Forum Jump: