03-03-2014, 06:46 PM
Yes, sadly the tale of Libanius is only a tale.
We can study the circumstances of the battle at Samarra and the whole story of the Persian Campaign but, as Libanius himself wrote, without direct and voluntary testimonials, without written pages by those who were there, we cannot advance any serious accusation against the Christians, so, the story of Libanius, is only a lie or better a nice tale by a friend of Iulianus, accusing without any proofs the Christians of the death of the Emperor. (the fact that I, as Diocle, as private citizen, firmly believe that an elite unit of Candidati doesn't flee in panic leaving alone the Emperor to be killed by the first poor moron passing there, the fact that the political situation in my opinion required the death of Julian, the fact that still today after so many years the Internet English translation of Ammianus is a falsified translation saving the arse of the Candidati, the fact that all the witnesses of the events at Samarra were killed or silenced by the two bastards usurpers appointed by a mass of Byzantine eunuchs, clergymen and bureaucrats, all these facts are nothing else than personal speculations by Diocle and don't change History, and History tells us that Iulianus has been killed by a Persian javelin thrown at him by a fleeing Persian soldier. END OF THE STORY)
In the Merovingian Gaul of the VI century there was not any Roman Unit nor any surviving Roman Military Tradition organizing the warfare in the Mrovingian Kingdom, if someone disagrees, well, produce some source and show us one of the most astonishing discoveries of the last 100 years.
We can study the circumstances of the battle at Samarra and the whole story of the Persian Campaign but, as Libanius himself wrote, without direct and voluntary testimonials, without written pages by those who were there, we cannot advance any serious accusation against the Christians, so, the story of Libanius, is only a lie or better a nice tale by a friend of Iulianus, accusing without any proofs the Christians of the death of the Emperor. (the fact that I, as Diocle, as private citizen, firmly believe that an elite unit of Candidati doesn't flee in panic leaving alone the Emperor to be killed by the first poor moron passing there, the fact that the political situation in my opinion required the death of Julian, the fact that still today after so many years the Internet English translation of Ammianus is a falsified translation saving the arse of the Candidati, the fact that all the witnesses of the events at Samarra were killed or silenced by the two bastards usurpers appointed by a mass of Byzantine eunuchs, clergymen and bureaucrats, all these facts are nothing else than personal speculations by Diocle and don't change History, and History tells us that Iulianus has been killed by a Persian javelin thrown at him by a fleeing Persian soldier. END OF THE STORY)
In the Merovingian Gaul of the VI century there was not any Roman Unit nor any surviving Roman Military Tradition organizing the warfare in the Mrovingian Kingdom, if someone disagrees, well, produce some source and show us one of the most astonishing discoveries of the last 100 years.
