02-08-2014, 05:11 PM
I'd have to say the one I posted of a "5th century frank" (the poster says 3rd or 4th century ,which is incorrect) could be accurate for several reasons:
1. Gold Hilt Blade - these first come about approximately 410 AD, after the introduction of Sassanian Gold Hilts and Cloisonne by the Huns.
2. The Brooches - again Cloisonne, indicating this man is 5th century.
However, I agree that osprey is not the best source (especially considering the belts they show, and in the 6th century image the D-shaped lamellar).
Can't say much about their later images. However, I agree that you should read the links on the forum he posted. I could probably draw a good depiction of a 5th century Frank of Chlodio or Merovaeus, but frankly (pun not intended) I don't have the time.
1. Gold Hilt Blade - these first come about approximately 410 AD, after the introduction of Sassanian Gold Hilts and Cloisonne by the Huns.
2. The Brooches - again Cloisonne, indicating this man is 5th century.
However, I agree that osprey is not the best source (especially considering the belts they show, and in the 6th century image the D-shaped lamellar).
Can't say much about their later images. However, I agree that you should read the links on the forum he posted. I could probably draw a good depiction of a 5th century Frank of Chlodio or Merovaeus, but frankly (pun not intended) I don't have the time.
Evan Schultheis | MODERATOR
Rhomaios Living History Society
Support usĀ on Patreon
Rhomaios Living History Society
Support usĀ on Patreon