05-10-2013, 02:10 AM
Whatever the ND says, that doesn't mean that pteryges were made of leather. Also, we should consider the period we're talking about. I'm afraid I assumed that it was about the 1st century, and you probably assumed it was about the Late army. We could keep discussing that way. :? illy:
But I do not have the impression that they would get tangled or bunched up. There are several members in our reenactmentgroup having pteryges, and I haven't seen them having that kind of problems with them. Of course I think that the condition for that is that they are firmly and properly attached to the subarmalis itself, and may be slightly to each other (the upper few inches).
But I do not have the impression that they would get tangled or bunched up. There are several members in our reenactmentgroup having pteryges, and I haven't seen them having that kind of problems with them. Of course I think that the condition for that is that they are firmly and properly attached to the subarmalis itself, and may be slightly to each other (the upper few inches).
Valete,
Titvs Statilivs Castvs - Sander Van Daele
LEG XI CPF
COH VII RAET EQ (part of LEG XI CPF)
MA in History
Titvs Statilivs Castvs - Sander Van Daele
LEG XI CPF
COH VII RAET EQ (part of LEG XI CPF)
MA in History