02-09-2005, 03:40 PM
Not totally (who knows how did ancient artillery look like? ), but more than those that can even now be seen on average books.<br>
Maybe new interpretations of available evidence might look striking when compared to the standard image of Ancient artillery that we're used to see since it was developed nearly one century ago... but probably the machines portraited on that Osprey are closer to the real apearance of ancient machines thna any other ones, up till now.<br>
I'd advice to read that book to anybody interested on having a first approach to the subject.<br>
<br>
Aitor <p></p><i></i>
Maybe new interpretations of available evidence might look striking when compared to the standard image of Ancient artillery that we're used to see since it was developed nearly one century ago... but probably the machines portraited on that Osprey are closer to the real apearance of ancient machines thna any other ones, up till now.<br>
I'd advice to read that book to anybody interested on having a first approach to the subject.<br>
<br>
Aitor <p></p><i></i>
It\'s all an accident, an accident of hands. Mine, others, all without mind, from one extreme to another, but neither works nor will ever.
Rolf Steiner
Rolf Steiner
