Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aetius and the Western Empire
#39
Quote:In the fifth century at least, the Persian front was quiet--certainly relative to what had transpired in previous centuries. Had there been major fighting there, precluding the interventions in the early 430s (Aspar), in 441, and in 468, historians would probably say Persia prevented the East from recovering North Africa hence was indirectly responsible for the fall of the West.
There was major fighting there (and what historians would say or not will forever remain a mystery) and it did effect actions against the Vandals even though it was not as heavy as the previous century. But keeping the frontier manned and ready would have been a constant worry anyway.

421 - War erupts in Persia (after the death of Yazdegird I), the Alan magister militum Ardabur campaigns against the Sassanid king Varanes (Bahram) V.
441 - Another expedition by Theodosius against the Vandals in Sicily turns back because the Persians invade the Empire.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Aetius and the Western Empire - by Robert Vermaat - 09-01-2012, 04:20 PM
Re: Aetius and the Western Empire - by Neutra - 09-05-2012, 05:08 PM
Re: Aetius and the Western Empire - by Neutra - 09-06-2012, 06:02 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  collapse of the Western empire eugene 4 1,307 07-08-2010, 02:06 PM
Last Post: Chariovalda
  Defences of the western Roman empire in 5th century Razor 60 13,594 03-08-2008, 12:16 AM
Last Post: Robert Vermaat

Forum Jump: