RomanArmyTalk › Research Arena › References & Reviews v
Fake footnotes?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Fake footnotes?
MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS Offline
Praefectus Castrorum
***
Posts: 2,462
Threads: 93
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation: 0
#4
03-17-2012, 03:14 AM
Apart from fake notes, which academically is a sin, as well as books you have not read on the literature list, as Jona says, the most ridiculous thing I have seen are scholars quoting themselves and then in the notes refer to their own books...

If that is not arrogance what is...

Wink

M.VIB.M.
Bushido wa watashi no shuukyou de gozaru.

Katte Kabuto no O wo shimeyo!

H.J.Vrielink.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Fake footnotes? - by Epictetus - 03-15-2012, 08:02 PM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by ValentinianVictrix - 03-15-2012, 08:08 PM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Jona Lendering - 03-17-2012, 02:33 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS - 03-17-2012, 03:14 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Lyceum - 03-17-2012, 04:27 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Lyceum - 03-17-2012, 04:32 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Epictetus - 03-17-2012, 10:38 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by D B Campbell - 03-17-2012, 10:24 PM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by mcbishop - 03-23-2012, 09:15 PM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Robert Vermaat - 03-24-2012, 07:00 PM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by D B Campbell - 03-25-2012, 02:00 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Robert Vermaat - 03-25-2012, 02:09 AM
Re: Fake footnotes? - by Eleatic Guest - 03-26-2012, 02:52 PM

Forum Jump: