Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roman Emperors and the \"King\" title
#8
Quote:If no one else can think of any other instances of “Rex” being used, he must really have been unique.

In fact, there are quite a number of sources from the 4th c. onwards that use the word 'rex' for an emperor. Best read this article:
Fanning, S. (1992): Emperors and empires in fifth-century Gaul, in: Drinkwater, J.F. and Hugh Elton eds.: Fifth-century Gaul: a Crisis of Identity?, (Cambridge), pp. 288-97.

Fanning comes up with a good number of authors having no problem using the title rex for Emperors, including Tertullian, Orosius, Sulpicius Severus, Ammianus Marcellinus, Claudius Claudianus, St. Augustine, Jordanes, Hilary of Poitiers, Prosper of Acquitaine, Venantius Fortunatus, Ennodius, Isidore of Seville, Paul the Deacon, etc.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Roman Emperors and the \"King\" title - by Robert Vermaat - 11-11-2011, 02:01 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Complexion of the roman emperors Virilis 28 12,179 05-31-2021, 02:43 PM
Last Post: Till_When?
  Portraits of Roman Emperors Renatus 4 1,377 08-18-2020, 02:43 PM
Last Post: Athena Areias
  Charlemagne and later \"Roman\" emperors Epictetus 22 7,552 12-26-2011, 11:05 PM
Last Post: Kai

Forum Jump: