Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why did the oval shield replace the scutum?
#7
Quote:However, what about the phalanx, which was formed occasionally?
'The phalanx' should not be confused with the classical Greek phalanx, but is better described as a single formation with a closed uninterrupted front of several units lined up next to each other, preferably 8 to 16 deep (a phalangial formation) in contrast to a manipular formation. Late Roman formations could be 2 to 4 lines, depending on the number of troops. There are similarities with the classical phalanx, but also big differences - the LR formation looks far more like a shield wall.

Personally I think that the oval (dished) scutum facilitates the use of the hasta, in this case identified as a ling (7-9ft) thrusting spear, which was developed during the 3rd c. against enemy cavalry (after we hear troops complaining about the pilum being too short). The hasta (also named contus) is probably couched under the armpit, allowing very little of the body to be exposed, as seen here performed in 2008 (LRE III):

[attachment=2057]shieldwall.jpg[/attachment]


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Why was did the oval shield replace the scutum? - by Robert Vermaat - 11-08-2011, 02:32 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Oval Scutum in use 1st Century A.D.? LonginusXXI 28 13,166 08-27-2016, 12:17 PM
Last Post: Anaticvla
  Did the Draco replace the Signum in the 4th century AD? markhebb 0 1,046 01-09-2011, 09:29 AM
Last Post: markhebb
  Scutum shield, and other issues Woadwarrior 14 3,134 05-24-2006, 08:46 PM
Last Post: Tarbicus

Forum Jump: