|
Phalanx Mobility
|
07-19-2005, 12:36 PM
The mobility of close formations is mainly a factor of their frontage, pivoting become more and more difficult the longer the frontage of the unit, that is why in XVIII century armies normally deployed in long 3 ranks lines developed all sort of columns to move quickly around the battlefield, or even to charge. As for turning opposite directions, it would be done by countermarching rather than by turning in place.
AKA Inaki
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Phalanx Mobility - by Anonymous - 01-25-2005, 05:29 AM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Dan Diffendale - 01-25-2005, 10:20 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Anonymous - 01-26-2005, 01:21 PM
Phalanx - by Anonymous - 01-26-2005, 05:37 PM
Re: Phalanx - by Anonymous - 01-26-2005, 08:32 PM
Re: Phalanx - by Anonymous - 01-27-2005, 05:13 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Anonymous - 01-27-2005, 05:36 PM
spatha190 - by Anonymous - 01-27-2005, 11:24 PM
Re: spatha190 - by Dan Diffendale - 01-27-2005, 11:40 PM
Re: spatha190 - by Anonymous - 01-28-2005, 05:15 PM
Re: spatha190 - by Anonymous - 03-08-2005, 11:48 PM
Re: spatha190 - by Anonymous - 03-27-2005, 05:22 PM
Re: spatha190 - by Anonymous - 03-31-2005, 09:24 AM
How to hold a sarissa - by Antonius Lucretius - 07-17-2005, 04:11 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Dan Howard - 07-18-2005, 01:25 AM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Antonius Lucretius - 07-18-2005, 12:36 PM
formations mobility - by Aryaman2 - 07-19-2005, 12:36 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by hoplite14gr - 07-19-2005, 01:30 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Aryaman2 - 07-19-2005, 08:59 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Anonymous - 07-19-2005, 11:55 PM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by Antonius Lucretius - 07-20-2005, 11:23 AM
Re: Phalanx Mobility - by hoplite14gr - 07-20-2005, 12:44 PM
|
