Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the Short Sword and Shield Overrated?
#35
The Romans lost as many battles as they won, and against plenty of opponents who's primary weapon was the spear, not the sword. Rome's main advantage was its ability to constantly come up with more troops to attack again and again. Rome outlasts its opponents. The Roman psyche was incredibly stubborn. They would continue to fight when more sensible people would give up and go away (if attacking) or surrender (if defending).
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Is the Short Sword and Shield Overrated? - by Dan Howard - 12-07-2010, 02:48 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Short Sword Underrated? JeffF 43 9,985 05-18-2011, 05:53 PM
Last Post: Virilis
  Semi Spatha/short sword Anonymous 19 7,476 01-18-2007, 03:58 AM
Last Post: markusaurelius
  Shield boss and sword ansje 12 2,705 12-15-2006, 04:44 PM
Last Post: aitor iriarte

Forum Jump: