12-23-2010, 01:24 PM
Sander, of course this is not what we nowadays understand as "abstract art". That´s not what I was talking about. In the actual meaning of the word (=> ab(s)-trahere), Roman art is very abstract => not "naturalistic".
Which IMO makes the sentence
Which IMO makes the sentence
Quote:Looking at Roman art generally, they weren't much for abstract reppresentationone, that is wrong, hence my interruption.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.