Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
VG Hart paper - Hatra superiority..
#8
Quote:When you add pulleys and increase the amount of draw length in the Hatra, the effect is doubled according to the mechanical advantage you assign to it.
The draw-length of the Hatra design can clearly be lengthened -- Mike Lewis has restricted it (to 103/105 degrees) by the positioning of the rear stanchions, but these can be moved. (I have not measured the theoretical maximum.)

Quote:When you increase the amount of horizontal movement by adding an additional 15-20 degrees of movement to the Orsova design, you end up with a discrepency in performance between the two. Clearly the Hatra with only 105 total degrees of movement is at a disadvantage in range and velocity not only as the Orsova now has a greater usable rotational range.
This is more tricky, as the Orsova design has a built-in restriction -- the bow-arms can only move within the range dictated by the vertical iron struts. (I have not measured this, but hopefully Nick based his kambestria -- the vertical spring-frames -- on the actual Orsova example.)
posted by Duncan B Campbell
https://ninth-legion.blogspot.com/
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: VG Hart paper - Hatra superiority.. - by D B Campbell - 10-28-2010, 01:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New group and Hatra Ballista LUCIUS ALFENUS AVITIANUS 10 2,774 06-28-2006, 01:09 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS

Forum Jump: