Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
East Roman empire and byzantium: chronological borders
#2
There is no rule. Personally, I think that the real turning point is the rise of Islam; the once polyglot and pluriform Christian Empire lost two patriarchates and its Syriac and Coptic parts. What was left, was religiously and linguistically uniform. For this reason, I use "Byzantine" after 650.

I use "Roman" up to 363. After that, the two halves of the Empire remained separated (except for those months when Theodosius was sole ruler). For the three centuries between 363 and 650, I use both expressions. Others will make different choices.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: East Roman empire and byzantium: chronological borders - by Jona Lendering - 10-21-2010, 08:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Borders folk may descend from Africans from Hadrian\'s Wall Robert Vermaat 30 9,475 10-26-2021, 07:26 AM
Last Post: John1
  The Roman Army in the East hybrid 3 1,386 04-17-2010, 01:29 PM
Last Post: D B Campbell
  5th Century West Roman / East Roman Armour SvenLittkowski 8 5,840 08-21-2008, 01:39 AM
Last Post: SvenLittkowski

Forum Jump: