Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How well armoured was the Roman army?
#33
Legions were very expensive commodity and I am not sure if it was actually financially possible to equip all troops with full armour.

http://www.strategypage.com/articles/de ... .htm#_ftn4 (itself very interesting article about Cnaeus Pompeius Magnus strategic options in start of civil war)

Footnote there:

Cicero's comment that the two under strength legions he controlled in Cilicia in 51 B.C. each cost about 3 million sestertii in pay and maintenance a year (Cicero, ad Fam., V , 20, 9, & ad Att., V, 11, 5), which was about 60% of the annual revenues of the province (Cf., Frank, pp. 136ff).

Also the comment by Crassus (IIRC) that man should not consider himself rich unless he was able to raise and equip and legion, vastly more expensive than just pay and maintenance.
(Mika S.)

"Odi et amo. Quare id faciam, fortasse requiris? Nescio, sed fieri sentio et excrucior." - Catullus -

"Nemo enim fere saltat sobrius, nisi forte insanit."

"Audendo magnus tegitur timor." -Lucanus-
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: How well armoured was the Roman army? - by Sardaukar - 08-18-2010, 06:14 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Armoured Ships in Antiquity Eleatic Guest 9 2,752 11-29-2008, 07:38 PM
Last Post: Sean Manning
  Roman armoured statue found in Kythnos Caballo 0 1,295 10-03-2008, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Caballo

Forum Jump: