04-10-2010, 12:06 PM
But that´s a formal feature, I think. And: Is "better" automatically with less mistakes? Maybe the mistakes make it more sympathic for some readers, which would find a too flawless text too virtual? Maybe one could like Caesar´s Latin better than Cicero´s? What one could say, is that the form is less flawed, but that does not make the text "better".
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.