09-11-2008, 01:58 PM
Well, my plan is to wear a belt on Saturday as a Hadrianic impression(with mail, greaves, Carlisle manica, subarmalis, and Gallic I).
Rather than my usual cingulum with danglium, I was thinking of a Utere Felix belt as found at Lyons ( though dated at 189 AD with Hadrian's being 117 to 138 AD)
![[Image: balteus-Lyonburial-3rd-mcb.gif]](http://www.romancoins.info/balteus-Lyonburial-3rd-mcb.gif)
but with a 1st century spatha rather than the later one as in the drawing. Thoughts?
Rather than my usual cingulum with danglium, I was thinking of a Utere Felix belt as found at Lyons ( though dated at 189 AD with Hadrian's being 117 to 138 AD)
but with a 1st century spatha rather than the later one as in the drawing. Thoughts?
![[Image: wip2_r1_c1-1-1.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/PaulHB/wip2_r1_c1-1-1.jpg)
![[Image: Comitatuslogo3.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/PaulHB/Comitatuslogo3.jpg)
