RomanArmyTalk › Research Arena › Roman Military History & Archaeology v
Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour
MARCVS PETRONIVS MAIVS Offline
Aquilifer
*****
Posts: 486
Threads: 39
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation: 0
#37
08-12-2008, 10:57 AM
Thanks for all your imput guys,

The passage about livy was particularly good. I suppose he is being practical, but like has been said, having a nice shinysuit of armour does give a certain psychological edge.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 03:39 AM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 11:00 PM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by MARCVS PETRONIVS MAIVS - 08-12-2008, 10:57 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Metal Armour-Polished or Dull? Sanvean 81 18,879 11-14-2007, 05:02 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS
  Were thin baldrics worn in the 3rd century ? Theodosius the Great 0 980 11-18-2004, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Theodosius the Great

Forum Jump: