Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour
#33
Quote:All those bits of brass on a lorica are virtually useless, except as bling. The hinges are not necessary, but they got bigger and fancier with every "upgrade".

Besides that, there's no metallurgical benefit from putting brass or copper on steel, it just makes for more rust on the steel. An equal thickness steel hinge, as surely the Romans new, is stronger than brass, but if the brass is strong enough, they probably used it because it's easier to work, and looks "better". If it were only about practicality, plain, rectangular hinges punched out of scrap lorica girdle straps would be perfectly functional. Boring, but probably better in the end. We know they liked shiny brass, because that's what they used.
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)

Saepe veritas est dura.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 03:39 AM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by Gaius Decius Aquilius - 08-07-2008, 11:00 PM
Re: Shining/Polished/New vs Worn/Weathered/Used Armour - by M. Demetrius - 08-08-2008, 11:43 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Metal Armour-Polished or Dull? Sanvean 81 18,766 11-14-2007, 05:02 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS
  Were thin baldrics worn in the 3rd century ? Theodosius the Great 0 976 11-18-2004, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Theodosius the Great

Forum Jump: