04-04-2008, 03:16 PM
Quote:L C Cinna:1u0h7ce7 Wrote:he clearly uses names usually used for auxiliary unitsWho says they're reserved for auxiliary units?
And don't be so over-sensitive. No one was attacking you.
yes sorry. hope you accept my apology I was a bit...well not the best day yesterday.
You are right about the names but the numbers still seem a bit strange to me. I've checked Junkelmann now and the numbers for cavalry given by Vegetius in the quote above seem too low for a cohors equitata.
Vegetius:
- 1105 infantry and 132 armoured cavalry for a cohors miliaria
555 soldiers plus 66 cavalry for a cohors quingenaria
Junkelmann:
- circa 800 infantry plus 256 to 320 cavalry for a cohors equitata miliaria
circa 480 infantry and 128 to 160 cavalry for a cohors quingenaria equitata
on the other hand if we take Vegetius numbers we'd come up with a legion's strenght of
6100 infantry and 726/730 cavalry
this seems way too much cavalry for a legion imho. The usual number given is around 120 legionary cavalry.
So I'm just wondering what he's talking about? A strenghtened legion? legio equitata? In this case I'm wondering when such a setup was common or came into use? late 2nd early 3rd century?
RESTITVTOR LIBERTATIS ET ROMANAE RELIGIONIS
DEDITICIVS MINERVAE ET MVSARVM
[Micha F.]
DEDITICIVS MINERVAE ET MVSARVM
[Micha F.]