01-28-2008, 01:15 AM
Quote:What´s wrong in the fact to wear a crista transversa? Because Obmann say there are no really evidences?Again, you totally miss the point of this discussion. In fact this is about finding out, whether Obmann is right or not, and whether his points are valid.
Quote:Bring´s that the discussion forward that you write Obmann write this, Obmann write that?Errr... :roll: Yes, it does. That´s what the discussion is about. :wink:
Quote:You have your meaning, the other´s have a other meanings, let us discussThat´s what we were doing, actually. And I don´t have a meaning - this is not about meanings, this is about evidence.
Quote:For me, the tombstones are evidence enough.That´s fine. Based on which arthistorical relief-display-theory? Are you a follower of the depth-is-all-flat-is-bad school or are you rather following the minimal-artistic-talent-of the-maker theory?
Quote: some of them discuss to much (i know some Profs and students, and most of them answered a question with another question. you know what i meanYes, I know. Academics suck! Treat´em like Sokrates, HE stopped asking questions when people were finished with him!
Quote:(7 years, and it´s not whitout reason that i´m a OptioYup, I can see that. )
Great we discussed this! now let´s get back to the actual topic! Yeee-haaaa!
D
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.