|
Anti-roman armor
|
11-08-2007, 10:12 AM
The other reason many give for mail being preferable is ease of field repairs. Is there any reason to suppose that a seg couldn't be repaired as easily in the field? Pre-cut spare parts and minimal riveting must have made it feasible? A large number of seg finds with odd and asymmetrical parts show the legionary wasn't particularly fussy as long as the gaps were filled.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO! |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Anti-roman armor - by PMBardunias - 11-02-2007, 03:03 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Dan Howard - 11-02-2007, 07:45 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Iagoba - 11-02-2007, 08:03 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Hibernicus - 11-02-2007, 09:05 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Matthew Amt - 11-03-2007, 02:28 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by PMBardunias - 11-03-2007, 03:57 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Matthew Amt - 11-04-2007, 03:08 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Urselius - 11-05-2007, 03:47 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by andersao - 11-06-2007, 10:10 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Dan Howard - 11-07-2007, 10:03 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by andersao - 11-07-2007, 06:37 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Dan Howard - 11-07-2007, 07:58 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Tarbicus - 11-08-2007, 10:12 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Artorius13 - 11-08-2007, 10:35 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Matthew Amt - 11-09-2007, 03:10 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Sardaukar - 11-10-2007, 08:53 AM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by M. Demetrius - 11-10-2007, 03:00 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Gaius Julius Caesar - 11-10-2007, 03:06 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Tarbicus - 11-10-2007, 03:49 PM
Re: Anti-roman armor - by Gaius Julius Caesar - 11-10-2007, 04:03 PM
|
