04-05-2007, 12:02 AM
Alexandr K -- thanks for the threat, it was very informative and I think the rugby discussion was great.
Giannis -- I agree with you that the loose order formation is inflammatory and probably incorrect, but he does bring up a good point about the stance. It would make sense to turn sideways and brace for impact, but I think a hoplite army could do that and still maintain locked shields in formation. I just can't believe more work hasn't been done on the subject.
Thanks for the info on the shield too. After thinking about it (and picking up a shield), it makes sense that the 45 degree angle is appropriate and offers more protection until the forces collide in the battle. That famous bronze statue of a hoplite shows the shield at an angle as well -- pretty solid if you ask me. I just hope someone takes the time to do an intense study, and hopefully reject Polybius' notion that a hoplite would need 6 feet of space to fight effectively.
Giannis -- I agree with you that the loose order formation is inflammatory and probably incorrect, but he does bring up a good point about the stance. It would make sense to turn sideways and brace for impact, but I think a hoplite army could do that and still maintain locked shields in formation. I just can't believe more work hasn't been done on the subject.
Thanks for the info on the shield too. After thinking about it (and picking up a shield), it makes sense that the 45 degree angle is appropriate and offers more protection until the forces collide in the battle. That famous bronze statue of a hoplite shows the shield at an angle as well -- pretty solid if you ask me. I just hope someone takes the time to do an intense study, and hopefully reject Polybius' notion that a hoplite would need 6 feet of space to fight effectively.
Gaius Tertius Severus "Terti" / Trey Starnes
"ESSE QUAM VIDERE"
"ESSE QUAM VIDERE"