Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can the Feltwell Spatha be used for a late 4th c./early 5th c. Roman re-enactment?
#16
Photobucket sucks, and now they're charging people for 3rd party hosting because of the lapsing of net neutrality laws in America (where they're based out of).

Use imgur, open up the image and copy and paste the link into [IMG] tags. It's free
Reply
#17
There are other chronologies then Miks (which I dont have yet though I've had it on order from the library for ages) the one I have is "Illerup Adal, Die Schwerter" which I highly recommend and pretty much cover swords from Northern Europe, "Osterburken-Kamathen" is there classified as "Osterburken-Vrasselt" and includes 13 swords of which one is "Kamathen".
The text says there are only fragments of the organic components of grips and impossible to tell the form, however one example from Vrasselt had decorated boat shaped metal plates for the guard and pommel and there was at least some ivory involved, the suggestion there is that these are Nydam type grips.... none of this type exists at illerup.

Osterburken-Vrasselt plus sub type 13 swords total, from the above vol.
   

Nydam Swords from Denmark in the early iron age
   

The Cumberland Hilt added here for its similarity to No4 from Nydam.
   

Source: http://www.barbicanra.co.uk/assets/pd-ap...pology.pdf
Ivor

"And the four bare walls stand on the seashore. a wreck a skeleton a monument of that instability and vicissitude to which all things human are subject. Not a dwelling within sight, and the farm labourer, and curious traveller, are the only persons that ever visit the scene where once so many thousands were congregated." T.Lewin 1867
Reply
#18
Awesome post, thanks. Yeah as far as I can tell the Osterburken Grips generally fall under Germanic Type-I (Not sure if Cumberland falls under that, it's later) which the no.4 from Nydam and the hilt from Samsun both belong to.

Hexagonal/Octagonal grips seem to be a uniquely 5th century trend, I think? Not sure.
Reply
#19
I have a copy of the Miks book with me. Interestingly enough I can't find the Feltwell listed.

Pouan is an Osterburken-Kemathen blade, much as I suspected (p. 708-709).
Reply
#20
(09-07-2017, 07:09 PM)Flavivs Aetivs Wrote: Hello there!

The Spatha was developed from the Sassanian Swords of the 3rd century and the Roman swords of the 1st-2nd centuries AD.

The "Feltwell Spatha" possess a hexagonal (in hindsight I should have had Gagan make it a shallow fuller) Illerup-Whyl type blade and a Germanic Type-I handle, which makes it ideal for the Early 4th through Early 5th centuries AD. The scabbard chape, slider, and mouthband are also consistent with this time period.

So in short: yes.

Hi,
I am not sure what you mean-- can you explain- let me see what I can still do.
Pictures would be nice

Gagan
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Late antiquity spatha question LUCIUS ALFENUS AVITIANUS 21 5,642 04-22-2015, 05:13 AM
Last Post: XorX
  Late Roman army Re-enactment Titus 2 1,703 02-01-2015, 07:37 PM
Last Post: Flavivs Aetivs
  Late Roman Spatha- Pattern welded blade markusaurelius 27 9,448 12-24-2014, 07:01 PM
Last Post: markusaurelius

Forum Jump: