Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The look of a late Roman general
#16
Ah, great improvements. Good work, Thijs!!
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply
#17
Quote:It is OK for me, Thijs! Big Grin
Being a little knicky-picky, I could say that the belt is rather late fourth-early fifth century in style. Belts during the first three quarters of fourth century were narrower.

Also, If the cuirass is interpreted as a 'musculata' the belt could just be dropped. If it is a squamata then the belt is fine. Of course that's the rub, because the musculata and squamata/plumata more or less merge in the late period. The squamata has a belt, the musculata does not. So since this is supposed to be a general, I would drop the belt, especially since you have the officer's knot above.

Your choice though,

Other than that rather minor quibble, it looks fantastic.
Theodoros of Smyrna (Byzantine name)
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)

Moderator, RAT

Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting

Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?
Reply
#18
Thanks Robert. And yes it's meant to be used in Rome: Total War.
Funny how two hobbies (history and computergames) meet each other Smile .

Anyway starting with the next one... :lol:
Thijs Koelewijn
Reply
#19
Will this be used in a RTR-mod for the expansion pack or som kind of different mod? What's the next one you will modify?

Kind regards,
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco

LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#20
I've never seen fringe on late-Roman pteruges, either in sculpture or reconstructions. I wonder what that suggests in terms of evolution in their construction.
Jaime
Reply
#21
Quote:I've never seen fringe on late-Roman pteruges, either in sculpture or reconstructions. I wonder what that suggests in terms of evolution in their construction.

Depends on the image.

The archangel Michael diptych in the Met has them, but it may be an anachronism. But it's true, in a lot of places, the fringes are shorter, more simply rendered or disappear altogether. Basil the II still has them on his though, that's 10th C., so they must be around, but that might be an intentional anachronism.

I wonder what it means too. I really do think that the originals were laminate linen and not leather. Maybe the later ones are leather and the fringe is not longer a natural by-product of their manufacture?

Travis
Theodoros of Smyrna (Byzantine name)
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)

Moderator, RAT

Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting

Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?
Reply
#22
It's not going to be used by RTR. We have our own mod called Fall of Rome and we're modifying the expansion pack. Perhaps reworking the legionarii but basically that one is done already. so I guess it will be a surprise Wink
Thijs Koelewijn
Reply


Forum Jump: