09-16-2008, 02:20 PM
The Punic army was mostly a mercenary army. Troops from subject territories were the majority with very little in the way of Punic citizen troops.
If I remember right Hannibals army was Hispanians, Gauls, Numidians, and Libyans.
What about the Punic navy? Was it manned by foreign rowers or was it like say the fleets of Athens a citizen navy?
Carthage never had the manpower to put citizen forces in the field to match Rome. Part of this was due to location. Italy was a more populas place than North Africa. But I am wondering if part of this is not also due to the fact that a majority of its population served in the navy. If Carthage fielded on average 200 Quinqueremes (each with about 450 men on board) that would be enough manpower to field 16 or more legions of troops.
I remember someone (not from this forum) once suggesting that the worship of Ba'al and the sacrificing of first born son must have hurt the population of Carthage but I doubt that it would have hurt it that badly and I know that by the 2nd Punic War it was common for families to "adopt" in a "son" from slaves so that he could be sacrificed in place of an actual son.
If I remember right Hannibals army was Hispanians, Gauls, Numidians, and Libyans.
What about the Punic navy? Was it manned by foreign rowers or was it like say the fleets of Athens a citizen navy?
Carthage never had the manpower to put citizen forces in the field to match Rome. Part of this was due to location. Italy was a more populas place than North Africa. But I am wondering if part of this is not also due to the fact that a majority of its population served in the navy. If Carthage fielded on average 200 Quinqueremes (each with about 450 men on board) that would be enough manpower to field 16 or more legions of troops.
I remember someone (not from this forum) once suggesting that the worship of Ba'al and the sacrificing of first born son must have hurt the population of Carthage but I doubt that it would have hurt it that badly and I know that by the 2nd Punic War it was common for families to "adopt" in a "son" from slaves so that he could be sacrificed in place of an actual son.
Timothy Hanna