Posts: 35
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Hello,
As I can see on late roman military tunics from Piazza Armerina mosaics, the ornaments depicted here are corresponding to types of the armours. For example this one:
http://scherminator.com/italy/sicily/pia...rina13.jpg
His tunic is clearly showing shoulderguard plates from old lorica segmentata.
There are other figures with typical shoulderparts of lorica musculata.
So I would like to know your opinion about this kind of continuation of Lorica segmentata in ornaments.
Thanks
Massimiliano Fedel
Classical Archaeology, Roman military Archaeology, Roman provincial Archaeology, Archaeology of Aquileia
Posts: 3,559
Threads: 275
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
10
Hi Massimiliano!
Interesting point, never thought of that. Anyway, in my opinion the decorative patterns at the shoulder of the tunic are just decorations and not necessarily depicting the shoulder guards of a Lorica Segmentata. If that were so, then the decorations on the sleeves might represent vambraces and then we would be in a deep sh... ! Btw, I always see roman things in everyday objects, like in a peppermill head I see a pommel of a gladius etc.....
Virilis / Jyrki Halme
PHILODOX
Moderator
Posts: 2,913
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
I think I have to agree with Virilis on this and are they not maybe some kind of reinforce possibly of leather over the cloth garment.
Brian Stobbs
Posts: 35
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Hello,
so yes, it could be just accidentaly, but it´s really interesting. In this mosaic there are depicted 4 shoulder stripes, as it was usually typical for sculptural depiction of LS. There is also another soldier wearing the same kind of tunica, and another persons wear tunicas with ornament simmilar to lorica musculata:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/co...oldato.JPG
http://www.comitatus.net/images/comitatustunics4.jpg
http://www.kornbluthphoto.com/images/Vit...inian5.jpg
During the 3rd century using of body armour degreed, and so some of the soldiers (light troops) could use these ornaments as "memory", or simply they would like to present themself with atributes typical for soldier. It is clear this type of tunica originated on danube frontier and has been used by soldiers.
But that´s all just my opinion
Massimiliano Fedel
Classical Archaeology, Roman military Archaeology, Roman provincial Archaeology, Archaeology of Aquileia
Posts: 228
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Well, according to Nicasie, Coulston, Southern and Dixon, Vegetius' story of armour being abandoned by the late Roman soldier is rather dubious.
However, the shoulder stripes a reference to or even a remnant of armour seems unlikely to me. The Roman tunica may have been a monochrome red, but in the Middle East, where the late Roman, long-sleeved tunic came from, armbands, shoulderstraps and decorative panels are already shown on the uniforms of Assyrian and Achaemenid soldiers. Therefore, my guess is that it is a coincidence.
Posts: 35
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Yes Vegetius´ story about it is wrong, body armour has been continually in use, but there had to be degree of armour use. We have no proof that legionary tunics were red.
Massimiliano Fedel
Classical Archaeology, Roman military Archaeology, Roman provincial Archaeology, Archaeology of Aquileia
Posts: 317
Threads: 19
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
6
Red was a prominent color of roman military tunic, but it was not standardised.
Mark - Legio Leonum Valentiniani
Posts: 15,118
Threads: 417
Joined: Mar 2002
Reputation:
79
Quote:so yes, it could be just accidentaly, but it´s really interesting. In this mosaic there are depicted 4 shoulder stripes, as it was usually typical for sculptural depiction of LS. There is also another soldier wearing the same kind of tunica, and another persons wear tunicas with ornament simmilar to lorica musculata:
These decorations have nothing to do with armour or 'the memory of armour'. In fact, this is how all tunica manicata were decorated, with patches (square segmentae, round orbiculi) or several stripes on the shoulder. In fact, this type of dress is not even military, everybody was wearing it. So no uniform, no military connections, no 'memory of armour' whatsoever I fear. It's all in the eyes of the beholder. ;-)
Posts: 283
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
3
Quote:Red was a prominent color of roman military tunic, but it was not standardised.
Some historians argue, that the masses prefered cheap colors. Grey, brown and red were rather cheap colors looking to ancient production processes.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
If I'm correct the only known method of producing red (using some kind of ground beetle I think) comes out as a salmon color at best.
Posts: 3,063
Threads: 218
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation:
2
Quote: ...comes out as a salmon color at best.
Hmmm...is that male-speak for pink??
hock: ;-)
Moi Watson
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Merlot in one hand, Cigar in the other; body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, what a ride!
Posts: 317
Threads: 19
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
6
MMFA:
Madder and bedstraw were both used for dyeing red. The shade only depends on your purse, you could get salmon pink to deep reddish purple (there was also a breed of sheep for the latter).
After off-white, red can be found the most in/on sources.
Mark - Legio Leonum Valentiniani
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
Awesome, thanks Mark.
@ Vindex
"IT'S LIGHTISH-RED"
(Red vs. Blue Reference if you dont get it)
|