Posts: 39
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
As an equestrian which would be a greater achievement?
Appointment as praetorian prefect or being an ex-praetor and being appointed as legate of one of Rome's elite legions.
Also, this is off topic but in Hadrian's time could a senator be appointed consulship for life? Because what does lifetime appointment in the Senate mean...you could only hold office for one year in each office...sorry for the off-topic question
Nicholas De Oppresso Liber
[i]“It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.â€
Posts: 2,366
Threads: 187
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Legionary legates were off-limits to equestrians so you'd have to be a senator. And you'd have to be a senator to qualify to be second in command, the senior tribune. But that changed during the 3rd century AD when the senate was excluded from legionary appointments to the benefit of the equestrians thereafter.
Being a prefect of the Praetorian Guard might mean sharing the position with someone else as was often the practice. But still, I think the position is more desirable since you'd be stationed in Rome with all its creature comforts and would probably earn better pay. An equestrian could not hope for a higher achievement, including being emperor because of his inferior social rank (but that changed in the 3rd century as well.)
There's also the position of Urban Prefect who commanded the cohorts who patrolled the streets of Rome, handling the day to day policiing of the Capital. But this position was only open to senators.
~Theo
Jaime
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
There is of course an exception, first in the command of the legion in Egypt and later in the command of II Parthica at Alba. However both of these stood below praetorian prefect in the cursus honorum of an equestrian.
Posts: 157
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
0
Define achievement. Are we in danger of confusing ultimate status with the struggle to get there?
Lochinvar/Ewan Carmichael
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
I'm not sure we can state that any legate had lictors if he was not at the same time the provincial governor. It´s not a magistracy with imperium or am I mistaken=
Posts: 2,366
Threads: 187
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
No, I think you're probably right, Jasper.
Unless the legate were to have pro-consular or pro-praetor authority they probably wouldn't have lictors. Thanks for clarifying. I must have been thinking more along the lines of the way things were done in the Republic.
~Theo
Jaime