the Psychology of \'red\' - Printable Version +- RomanArmyTalk (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat) +-- Forum: Recreational Arena (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: the Psychology of \'red\' (/showthread.php?tid=3386) |
the Psychology of \'red\' - richsc - 05-19-2005 The journal Nature has a UK study on the color red and winning sports teams. Seems folks in red tend to win. Would really seem to me to argue for the most visible things, a red shield, than anything else, but worth perusing. [url:3jcv6v25]http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050516/full/050516-4.html[/url] Re: the Psychology of \'red\' - Uwe Bahr - 05-19-2005 Richard, You didn't think of influencing the fight between the red or white tunica warriors, didn't You ? :wink: Uwe Re: the Psychology of \'red\' - FAVENTIANVS - 05-19-2005 Well, red is the color of blood, and this could be readyly directed to war, isn't it? Re: the Psychology of \'red\' - richsc - 05-19-2005 Quote:Richard, Jupiter forbid! Red - Carus Andiae - 05-22-2005 From the article: Quote:In human societies, red's aggressive, winning quality may explain why many military uniforms and medals feature the colour, comments Andrew Walton, a sports psychologist based in Coventry, UK. Really? And I thought the English (and later British) adopted red because it was the cheapest dye: From the New Model Army Contracts: Quote: 14 ffebruary Anno Dni 1645 [1646] Although allegedly it does make you look bigger. By the way, 17 shillings is worth about £94 (U.S. $171.77) in today's money. Not bad for 2000 sets of coats and breeches! :lol: Re: the Psychology of \'red\' - Marcus Mummius - 05-23-2005 That's 343 540 $ in total! Héhé nice order. |