ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Printable Version +- RomanArmyTalk (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat) +-- Forum: Research Arena (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: References & Reviews (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Thread: ORBIS Roman mapping resource (/showthread.php?tid=23412) |
ORBIS Roman mapping resource - D B Campbell - 12-30-2013 I just stumbled across Stanford University's Orbis web site. It looks very interesting. Click on the "Mapping ORBIS" tab to explore routes around and across the Roman world. ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Flavivs Aetivs - 12-30-2013 I think this was posted some time last year (possibly 2 years ago). It's a great link! ORBIS Roman mapping resource - D B Campbell - 12-30-2013 Quote:I think this was posted some time last year (possibly 2 years ago). It's a great link!It certainly is a great resource. (I searched RAT using the "1 year" option and found nothing, so I thought it must be new to forum-users. The basic version was apparently launched in June 2012, but the fully-featured site seems to date from January 2013.) ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Renatus - 12-30-2013 Quote:I think this was posted some time last year (possibly 2 years ago). It's a great link!This must be what you're thinking of: http://www.romanarmytalk.com/17-roman-military-history-a-archaeology/312930-roman-empire-travel-times.html#312930 ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Vindex - 12-30-2013 Is it me - but both links now do not seem to work? ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Flavivs Aetivs - 12-30-2013 http://orbis.stanford.edu/# This is the one on my bookmarks page, it works fine. ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Vindex - 12-30-2013 Nope - no go! Better try it through Firefox I suppose, ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Flavivs Aetivs - 12-30-2013 I don't use Internet Explorer anymore because about 5 minutes in I get a BSOD. I do everything through Firefox now, and if I can't do it with Firefox I use Chrome. ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Renatus - 12-30-2013 Quote:Nope - no go! Better try it through Firefox I suppose,I can't get it with IE either but Firefox seems to work. ORBIS Roman mapping resource - 66kbm - 12-31-2013 Works for me...............but map only goes to to Dunovaria....Modern Dorchester. So I think this site realy needs updating.. There is an Isca listed, at Cearleon, but no Isca Dunomniorum...Exeter. In fact nothing is lisdted west of Dunonovaria.. Are there reasons why or am I missing something? Kevin ORBIS Roman mapping resource - Flavivs Aetivs - 12-31-2013 There's a lot of cities they miss. Catalaunum is one. I think Augustonemetum is missing. Many go by Principate names (e.g. Cenabum instead of Aurelianum). ORBIS Roman mapping resource - 66kbm - 12-31-2013 Good shout Evan...........BUT.....always a But My area, sounds personal, I suppose it is really,its also missing at least 10 military camps and many other camps marching/temporary within the South West peninsula of the UK.. I will keep it simple by not going on..... Kevin ORBIS Roman mapping resource - D B Campbell - 12-31-2013 Quote:I think this site realy needs updating.. There is an Isca listed, at Cearleon, but no Isca Dunomniorum...Exeter. In fact nothing is lisdted west of Dunonovaria.. Are there reasons why or am I missing something?Possibly. In the Understanding Orbis tab, the creators explain that "the model is in the first instance confined to the main arterial roads and other essential connectors of the Roman road network instead of seeking to reproduce it in its (known) entirety. Many minor rivers that are not included would have been navigated by rafts and shallow boats. The number of potential sea routes is vast, constrained only by the number of points of anchorage that might be connected across maritime space. By necessity and design, ORBIS models a simplified version of Roman connectivity. By necessity, given the workload associated with any serious attempt to track down every single Roman road and every navigable river, and especially with the computational burden of simulating discrete outcomes for tens of thousands of often only marginally different sea routes." I suppose most users would be more concerned to learn how long it would take to get (say) from Rome to the provincial capital at London, or even from London to the frontier at Carlisle. It gives us a ballpark figure to play with. I don't think the creators intended to be exhaustive. Life's too short ... :wink: |