+- RomanArmyTalk (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat)
+-- Forum: Research Arena (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Roman Military History & Archaeology (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method (/showthread.php?tid=11851)
Pages:
1
2
Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - Caballo - 02-21-2008
Hi,
Here is the archaeology of a method of Roman scabbard hanging that was certainly new to me, from the massive Studien zur romischen Schwertbewaffnung in der Kaiserzeit by Christian Miks (pp 286, 287). The "usual" way of a leather strip being either wound round the scabbard through the slide is also discussed, but what was interesting here is the use of small "studs" to hold the belt
Heres the archeology
![[Image: LateRomanswordattachmentarchaeology.gif]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/PaulHB/LateRomanswordattachmentarchaeology.gif)
And here are two possible reconstructions.
![[Image: LateRomanswordattachment.gif]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/PaulHB/LateRomanswordattachment.gif)
He also describes a later version where the studs are actually fixed to the scabbard and the leather goes over these and through the slide.
(And a great book, btw!)
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - Robert Vermaat - 02-21-2008
That's very interesting stuff Paul. Thanks for sharing that.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - aitor iriarte - 02-21-2008
I've been thinking about it for a long time, but I've got no time for real experimenting.
Of course, I am not thinking on third century baltea like those depicted on Miks' book but on our later ones. 8)
My idea is that the scabbard's position must be fixed on the balteus and, therefore, the simplest solution involving two mushroom studs would be to attach a a short strap section to the balteus by means of those studs. Either in front of it and through the slider or to its back (in that case, it would be the balteus the one passing through the slider.
Aitor
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - LUCIUS ALFENUS AVITIANUS - 02-21-2008
One balteus of one of the two third century impressions of Legio Prima Germanica have used that method.
I can't put pictures yet. The owner is Tibisius, when i talk with him, i suggest him to make some detailed pictures.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - Peroni - 02-21-2008
Exactly the same priciple as the third Century fungiform bottons seen on ring buckle belt fastenings.
Thanks for that Paul! Shame I just completed my late Roman baldric with a different fastening method! :?
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - John Conyard - 02-21-2008
These mirror late Germanic fittings. But interesting stuff.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - markusaurelius - 02-24-2008
Very interesting. Makes sense to me, and looks neat as well. Wonder if the studs would have make a "clinking" sound as the sword slid between them while you walked....
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - Gaius Julius Caesar - 02-24-2008
I imagine the leather would hold it tight enough to eliminate that!?
I am guessing the logic is to stop the sword floating about? also a secure mount for withdrawing the sword?
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - garrelt - 02-27-2008
Dutch Finds.
From the book:
Van Romeinse soldaten en Cananefaten.
Gebruiksvoorwerpen van de Scheveningseweg.
J.A. Waasdorp 1999
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - M. Demetrius - 02-27-2008
The depth of the "slider" would indicate a fairly thick piece of leather for the belt, don't you think? Odds are, the one would be patterned after the other.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - garrelt - 02-28-2008
Slider dimension
Length 8,7cm
Maximum width 1cm
Maximum thickness 1,3cm
Depth for passing through the belt 0,8cm
Fitting dimension
Maximum diameter 2,2cm
Total height 1,5cm
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - M. Demetrius - 02-28-2008
So the belt could reasonably be .5 cm, which is pretty thick leather. It figures that a belt to hold a sword should have considerable thickness or the belt would bend under the weight of the sword, especially on such a narrow area.
Could that attachment point additionally have been reinforced in some way?
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - garrelt - 02-29-2008
If the scabbard has an outer cover of 0,2cm thick leather, the maximun thickness of a belt could be 0,3cm.
If a fitting is not used for decoration, but for rivetting 2 belts together the gap between the 2 plates can be 0,5cm or more.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - M. Demetrius - 02-29-2008
Garrelt, wouldn't the entire thickness of the scabbard be under the rivetted area that the "foot" of the belt loop rests on? In other words,
scabbard: wood, leather, brass trim if any, belt loop foot, rivet head (as seen in cross section).
Or am I missing something? That wouldn't be news, of course if I were.
Re: Late Roman Scabbard attachment- alternative method - garrelt - 02-29-2008
I think that the second picture in this tread answers your question.
The build up of a scabberd could be as you stated.
Also don't forget the felt/woollen lining inside the scabbard.