06-30-2010, 05:42 PM
Here is a remarkable article, and I do not whether to laugh or cry. I am certainly willing to accept that Plato organized his works along mathematical principles, but the article is too clumsily written to be taken seriously. For example, the idea that the book of nature was written in the language of mathematics is not Newton's, but Galilei's; comparing Plato to Einstein is as absurd as comparing hypotheses to experimental science; and I won't mention that the idea of a "Plato Code" does not make a reliable impression.
Does anyone know more about this theory?
Does anyone know more about this theory?