Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
new King Arthur movie
#76
Ave, Deb.<br>
<br>
I cited Xena above Hercules since it was the more successful of the two . I see little difference between them, except Hercules was at least a real Greek mythical figure. Xena came out from left field somewhere .<br>
<br>
As for the anti-Roman movies : Yes the Romans did kill Christ, but even when the Romans are already Christian they're still not depicted as the good guys. Just watch the TV movie "Attila".<br>
<br>
Even in movies that have nothing to do with Christ, thugs like Spartacus, Attila, Boudicca, and Vercingertorix are made the heroes while the Romans are shown as the villians. In spite of that, I still like 90 to 95% of films on Rome. I just wish they'd try a different formula for a change .<br>
<br>
On "Kingdom of Heaven" : Ridley Scott is a great director (though he's made his share of bad films) but I don't like what I've read about his movie. Apparently he's going to demonize the Crusaders and glorify the Arabs. I'm sure he'll show the Crusaders slaughtering all the civilians during the siege of Jerusalem (which is true) and nobody will mention that that was <strong>standard warfare</strong> for thousands of years and continued to be so for centuries after. I believe England's top historian (Keegan) has already denounced the film as non-historical after reading the script.<br>
But we'll see.<br>
<br>
-Theo<br>
<br>
<p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p200.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showUserPublicProfile?gid=theodosiusthegreat>Theodosius the Great</A> at: 12/30/04 3:14 am<br></i>
Jaime
Reply


Messages In This Thread
new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 02-20-2004, 04:06 PM
A Buttload of Evil - by Gregg - 02-20-2004, 08:56 PM
Re: A Buttload of Evil - by Anonymous - 02-20-2004, 09:36 PM
Only Connect - by Nathan Ross - 02-20-2004, 09:54 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Robert Vermaat - 02-20-2004, 11:36 PM
Usual Suspects - by Nathan Ross - 02-21-2004, 12:14 AM
Re: Usual Suspects - by Anonymous - 02-24-2004, 03:02 PM
Re: Usual Suspects - by TITVS SABATINVS AQVILIVS - 02-25-2004, 11:12 AM
history surpasses fantasy - by Goffredo - 02-25-2004, 12:33 PM
Re: history surpasses fantasy - by rekirts - 02-25-2004, 04:00 PM
Re: history surpasses fantasy - by Nathan Ross - 02-29-2004, 02:21 PM
Re: history surpasses fantasy - by rekirts - 02-29-2004, 04:19 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 04-20-2004, 06:54 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Gregg - 04-21-2004, 04:05 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 04-21-2004, 05:45 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by rekirts - 04-21-2004, 07:10 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 04-22-2004, 04:41 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Chariovalda - 07-07-2004, 04:09 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Robert Vermaat - 07-08-2004, 06:28 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 07-08-2004, 11:41 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Robert Vermaat - 07-08-2004, 12:04 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 07-08-2004, 07:46 PM
why be accurate - by Goffredo - 07-09-2004, 08:45 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 07-09-2004, 03:12 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Robert Vermaat - 07-09-2004, 04:01 PM
History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-09-2004, 05:49 PM
Re: History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-09-2004, 06:09 PM
Re: History & Hollywood - by Frank Miranda - 07-09-2004, 10:43 PM
History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-10-2004, 03:54 AM
Re: History & Hollywood - by mcbishop - 07-10-2004, 08:00 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 07-10-2004, 01:23 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Frank Miranda - 07-11-2004, 03:59 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Robert Vermaat - 07-11-2004, 05:52 AM
History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-11-2004, 08:18 AM
Re: History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-11-2004, 03:30 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Frank Miranda - 07-11-2004, 07:36 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 07-11-2004, 08:19 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 07-12-2004, 03:32 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Jasper Oorthuys - 07-12-2004, 04:46 AM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Anonymous - 07-12-2004, 02:38 PM
It was suppose to be a roman movie, - by Anonymous - 07-12-2004, 02:47 PM
Re: It was suppose to be a roman movie, - by Anonymous - 07-12-2004, 03:12 PM
Hollywood - by Matthew Amt - 07-12-2004, 04:42 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Frank Miranda - 07-12-2004, 05:11 PM
\'Based on a True Story\' - by Anonymous - 07-12-2004, 05:38 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Vincula - 07-12-2004, 07:05 PM
Re: new King Arthur movie - by Muzzaguchi - 07-12-2004, 10:49 PM
History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 07-13-2004, 02:16 AM
Arthur - by Anonymous - 07-13-2004, 02:51 PM
Historical Fiction Movies - by Anonymous - 07-13-2004, 04:40 PM
Re: Historical Fiction Movies - by Anonymous - 07-13-2004, 07:30 PM
Re: Historical Fiction Movies - by Anonymous - 07-13-2004, 07:59 PM
Re: Historical Fiction Movies - by Anonymous - 07-14-2004, 12:44 AM
Re: Historical Fiction Movies - by Muzzaguchi - 07-14-2004, 01:08 AM
Re: Historical Fiction Movies - by mcbishop - 07-14-2004, 10:00 AM
King Arthur - by Anonymous - 07-14-2004, 12:46 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Jeroen Pelgrom - 07-14-2004, 02:09 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Anonymous - 07-14-2004, 07:41 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Vincula - 07-14-2004, 11:49 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Anonymous - 07-15-2004, 02:14 AM
Re: King Arthur - by Anonymous - 07-16-2004, 07:20 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Anonymous - 08-03-2004, 03:12 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Robert Vermaat - 08-04-2004, 05:09 AM
Re: King Arthur - by Jeroen Pelgrom - 08-09-2004, 05:31 AM
historical vericity in movies - by Anonymous - 09-19-2004, 04:03 PM
Re: King Arthur - by mcbishop - 09-19-2004, 06:10 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Anonymous - 09-20-2004, 04:44 PM
Re: King Arthur - by rekirts - 12-26-2004, 11:41 PM
Re: King Arthur - by Lepidina - 12-27-2004, 02:26 PM
History & Hollywood - by Anonymous - 12-27-2004, 06:13 PM
Re: History & Hollywood - by Chariovalda - 12-27-2004, 07:25 PM
Re: Arthur - by Theodosius the Great - 12-28-2004, 07:06 PM
Re: Arthur - by Lepidina - 12-28-2004, 08:23 PM
Arthur - by Theodosius the Great - 12-29-2004, 08:50 AM
Re: Arthur - by Chariovalda - 01-06-2005, 01:51 PM
saw King Arthur last night! - by Goffredo - 01-16-2005, 01:24 PM
Re: saw King Arthur last night! - by Ebusitanus - 01-31-2005, 05:32 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Theodosius the Great - 01-31-2005, 10:14 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Ebusitanus - 02-01-2005, 10:40 AM
Re: Gladiator - by Robert Vermaat - 02-02-2005, 12:54 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Ebusitanus - 02-02-2005, 02:21 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Uwe Bahr - 02-04-2005, 04:39 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Chariovalda - 02-04-2005, 09:29 PM
Re: Gladiator - by Thiudareiks Flavius - 02-25-2005, 02:57 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  History Channel program on King Arthur Anonymous 14 2,916 06-24-2004, 12:45 PM
Last Post: Anonymous
  Arthur, King of the Britons Q Rutilius 2 1,236 01-13-2003, 08:15 PM
Last Post: derek forrest

Forum Jump: