09-19-2022, 05:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2023, 08:56 PM by Nathan Ross.)
(09-19-2022, 05:30 PM)MonsGraupius Wrote: I have shown, firstly
You really haven't.
The destruction was extensive, and is dated to 55-70, and I have quoted sources to support this. The buildings you mentioned probably date from reconstruction after the fire. Unless your lamp also burned most of London, it was not the cause.
(09-19-2022, 05:30 PM)MonsGraupius Wrote: bypassing the important settlement of St.Albans.
Why do you keep claiming this? I have been saying exactly the opposite for over ten years.
(09-19-2022, 05:30 PM)MonsGraupius Wrote: Seems as if you have no idea that London was an insignificant settlement at the time of the Romans!
This would be the settlement of c.10,000 people, second only to Colchester (c.15,000) in the whole of Britain, and twice the size of St Albans (c.5000)? The major entrepot for the Gallic trade and base of the procurator? That little place? Hmmmmm....
Nathan Ross
