10-25-2010, 06:24 AM
"Doctor Duncan" wrote:
And why do you consider this an "extraordinarily lengthy thread"? At six pages or so it is fairly typical - and not even in the same league as others such as the "Sub Roman Britain (cavalry etc) thread, now on its forty-fifth page, or the various "linothorax" debate threads......
Quote:Having just happened upon this (extraordinarily lengthy) thread, I am intrigued to know exactly who suggested that the falx was "some sort of 'super-weapon'" in any case?! I have never come across such an assertion....which shows you did not bother to read the thread, for the assertion is made more than once in its course, that the 'falx' was such a deadly 'super-weapon', and so effective, that it caused the Romans to modify their armour and equipment. This view has gained acceptance particularly among wargamers and re-enactors, and others interested in Trajan's Dacian Wars, and was first put forward by Phil Barker (in the UK) around 1970.
And why do you consider this an "extraordinarily lengthy thread"? At six pages or so it is fairly typical - and not even in the same league as others such as the "Sub Roman Britain (cavalry etc) thread, now on its forty-fifth page, or the various "linothorax" debate threads......
"dulce et decorum est pro patria mori " - Horace
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff