Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
When Did The Roman Army Standardize Using Plate Armor?
#21
(08-26-2021, 09:54 AM)Dan Howard Wrote: The armours constructed of weaker materials were made to be thicker and heavier. The result is that they all stopped the same weapons.

So the solution is to have an heavier and so less efficient soldier? This means your soldier will combat for less time, will be able to cover less distancy, will be injured quicly and with less effort from the enemy. Just in case it is true... and it is quite absurd. It is not a mistery that mail was replaced with plate armor several times in the history. When an army had enough organization/logistic to replace it, the plate armor replaced it. 
Also, are you able to calculate how much a mail has to be thicker to resist impact Segmentata was able to afford?
- CaesarAugustus
www.romanempire.cloud
(Marco Parente)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: When Did The Roman Army Standardize Using Plate Armor? - by CaesarAugustus - 08-26-2021, 03:50 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Full Plate Armor? SigniferOne 75 23,730 01-16-2013, 02:39 AM
Last Post: Burzum
  Plate Armor Endurance study rrgg 14 3,469 07-22-2011, 10:12 PM
Last Post: Crispvs
  Plate-mail hybrid armor FlaviusCrispus 31 6,942 06-28-2006, 04:21 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS

Forum Jump: